Both Flores and Sanchez were endorsed by their respective state party chairs and vice chairs.īut Flores had virtually all the advantages throughout the special election, especially when it came to fundraising. Ted Cruz, while Sanchez’s biggest supporters among elected officials were Gonzalez and Vela. Sanchez and his allies did not ignore Flores, painting her as an extremist acolyte of former President Donald Trump due to past social media activity that cast doubt on the 2020 election results and included hashtags for the QAnon conspiracy movement.įlores had the backing of top Texas Republicans including Gov. He also campaigned as a moderate, calling himself a "conservative Democrat" and "pro-life" Catholic. Sanchez also played up his background, starting with his upbringing on his family farm and later his long career in public service. In one of her TV ads, she said the Rio Grande Valley is “under attack” at the border and promised not to let the “compadrismo” - cronyism - “in Washington ruin our communities.” She mostly ignored Sanchez but took a sharp tone against Washington, D.C., Democrats in general. Border Patrol agent and as a Mexican immigrant whose parents brought her to the United States as a young child. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee helped fund a $100,000 digital ad buy with Sanchez’s campaign, and House Majority PAC - the top Democratic super PAC in House races - launched a $115,000 TV ad buy against Flores.įlores campaigned hard on her story as the wife of a U.S. Goliath fight, with himself playing David.ĭespite their downplaying of the stakes, national Democrats ended up spending a little on the race once early voting got underway. Vastly outspent by Flores, Sanchez repeatedly compared the special election to a David vs. The dynamic put Democrats into an unusual underdog position in a region of the state they have long dominated.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |